Weaknesses

These weaknesses are based on months of brutal feedback from the community, both crypto-natives and non-crypto-natives. Even though different community members expressed their concerns differently, we have segmented the feedback and structured it for clarity.

1. BSC-based

Zodium is built on the Binance Smart Chain, one of the leading blockchains, especially in the play-to-earn economy. However, it is the case that some gamers prefer to have their games playable on other blockchain networks.

As much as we believe the future is multi-chain, building a sustainable gaming ecosystem is one step before the other. According to internal analysis and the team's ratio decidendi on this subject, if the ecosystem cannot gain adoption by only being deployed on the Binance Smart Chain, what sponsors the speculation that it will with being deployed on several chains?

1. Requires Wallets

Research has shown that some non-native crypto gamers have friction when signing in with their wallets to play games. Unfortunately, some do not even have wallets to start with.

As an ecosystem that hopes to acquire more non-native gamers, we are moved to agree this might be a weakness and an hindrance to adoption.

On this note, we have included on our roadmap to embrace modal account abstraction, a technical terminology for making signing and logging-in to Web3 applications easy and similar to the Web2 gaming experience.

1. Funds Needed to Draw NFTs

100 $ZODI is required to draw a Kind NFT. There have been concerns by some developers that they could not even try out Charis because they were required to have funds to purchase the needed NFTs.

Unfortunately, our tokenomics design and revenue model demand the financialization of the in-game assets to build a thriving ecosystem. At the same time, we have tried to make it as accessible as possible.